Who's the worst President of the 20th Century?
- Sunday, June 25 2006 @ 04:48 PM CST
- Contributed by: filbert
- Views: 1,209
This story alone takes George H.W. Bush out of the running.
If you ever thought that President Clinton gave a damn about U.S. national security, then try to explain this Wall Street Journal op-ed by former FBI Director Louis Freeh (without impugning Mr. Freeh's character, that is):
Oh, by the way, why isn't Sandy Berger in prison right now for stealing classified documents from the National Archive?
If you ever thought that President Clinton gave a damn about U.S. national security, then try to explain this Wall Street Journal op-ed by former FBI Director Louis Freeh (without impugning Mr. Freeh's character, that is):
Finally, frustrated in my attempts to execute Mr. Clinton's "leave no stone unturned" order, I called former president George H.W. Bush. I had learned that he was about to meet Crown Prince Abdullah on another matter. After fully briefing Mr. Bush on the impasse and faxing him the talking points that I had now been working on for over two years, he personally asked the crown prince to allow FBI agents to interview the detained bombers.Currently, only Jimmy "Malaise" Carter stands between the title of Worst President of the 20th Century and William Jefferson Clinton. But there's still time for the "Comeback Kid" to overtake the current #1.
After his Saturday meeting with now-King Abdullah, Mr. Bush called me to say that he made the request, and that the Saudis would be calling me. A few hours later, Prince Bandar, then the Saudi ambassador to Washington, asked me to come out to McLean, Va., on Monday to see Crown Prince Abdullah. When I met him with Wyche Fowler, our Saudi ambassador, and FBI counterterrorism chief Dale Watson, the crown prince was holding my talking points. He told me Mr. Bush had made the request for the FBI, which he granted, and told Prince Bandar to instruct Nayef to arrange for FBI agents to interview the prisoners.
Several weeks later, agents interviewed the co-conspirators. For the first time since the 1996 attack, we obtained direct evidence of Iran's complicity. What Mr. Clinton failed to do for three years was accomplished in minutes by his predecessor. This was the breakthrough we had been waiting for, and the attorney general and I immediately went to Mr. Berger with news of the Saudi prison interviews.
Upon being advised that our investigation now had proof that Iran blew up Khobar Towers, Mr. Berger's astounding response was: "Who knows about this?" His next, and wrong, comment was: "That's just hearsay." When I explained that under the Rules of Federal Evidence the detainees' comments were indeed more than "hearsay," for the first time ever he became interested--and alarmed--about the case. But this interest translated into nothing more than Washington "damage control" meetings held out of the fear that Congress, and ordinary Americans, would find out that Iran murdered our soldiers. After those meetings, neither the president, nor anyone else in the administration, was heard from again about Khobar.
Oh, by the way, why isn't Sandy Berger in prison right now for stealing classified documents from the National Archive?