Sioux Falls is #1
- Friday, May 13 2005 @ 11:11 AM CST
- Contributed by: filbert
- Views: 1,510
Sioux Falls is a very, very nice town. Sadly, it's too cold for Snookums, however.
News. Sports. Fun. Life. (And, it's pronounced muh-DARE-ee)
Welcome to Medary.com Friday, November 22 2024 @ 05:00 AM CST
Sioux Falls is a very, very nice town. Sadly, it's too cold for Snookums, however.
Please feel free to comment on Where We Stand in the Comments section of this article.
Many conservatives consider the fight over judges their political Armageddon, but conservative icon and former federal judge Ken Starr says it has gotten out of control, reports CBS News correspondent Gloria Borger.
"The confirmation process has not only become ugly and has become a shouting match," he said. "This is a radical, radical departure from our history and our traditions and it amounts to an assault on the judicial branch of government."
Only problem is that Starr wasn't talking about the conservatives, as the quote implies, but about the Democrats stonewalling of judicial nominations.
Ramesh Ponnuru of the National Review e-mailed Starr, and got this response:
"In the piece that I have now seen, and which I gather is being lavishly quoted, CBS employed two snippets. The 'radical departure' snippet was specifically addressed — although this is not evidenced whatever from the clip — to the practice of invoking judicial philosopy as a grounds for voting against a qualified nominee of integrity and experience. I said in sharp language that that practice was wrong. I contrasted the current practice . . . with what occurred during Ruth Ginsburg's nomination process, as numerous Republicans voted (rightly) to confirm a former ACLU staff lawyer. They disagreed with her positions as a lawyer, but they voted (again, rightly) to confirm her. Why? Because elections, like ideas, have consequences. . . . In the interview, I did indeed suggest, and have suggested elsewhere, that caution and prudence be exercised (Burkean that I am) in shifting/modifying rules (that's the second snippet), but I likewise made clear that the 'filibuster' represents an entirely new use (and misuse) of a venerable tradition. . . .
Snookums wonders why I will not watch "60 Minutes." Well, at this point, anyone who trusts anything coming out of CBS News is at best a dupe. Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" has more news credibility than CBS News.
The mainstream media awakens from their slumber:
Washington Post: Possible Voter Fraud Found in Milwaukee
San Francisco Chronicle: Investigators Find Evidence of Voter Fraud
Oshkosh Northwestern (editorial): Doyle losing more ground on ballot fraud problems
Indianapolis Star (editorial): Show your ID and avoid this mess
Powerline is more blunt: Was Wisconsin Stolen?
So, in the face of this as well as the ongoing Washington State gubernatorial controversy, why is the ironically named Democratic Party opposing the common-sense solution of presenting identification before being allowed to vote?
P.S. Anybody remember the incident where twenty (20!) Republican get-out-the-vote vans had their tires slashed the night before the election? "Isolated incident," the Democratic machine leaders say, "nothing to see here, no conspiracy."
Yeah, right.
P.P.S It will be amusing now to see the Google ads (over to the left) go nuts with bash-Bush pro-Democrat ads, now that I've posted an article which dares to use the D-word three times in a single article. Sheesh.
This Kansas City Business Journal gives the details--if it goes through, the swap will happen in mid-2006, leaving Comcast the dominant cable comany in Kansas City.
Frighteningly, Marquette president Robert Wild set the tone for a continuing debacle when he said in a written statement:
I'm awaiting the patch and will link to it when it comes out.
One workaround is to go to Tools>Options>Web Features, and unclick "Allow Web Sites to Install Software." (via SANS Internet Storm Center).