Contributed by: filbert Thursday, May 12 2005 @ 08:45 PM CST
Many conservatives consider the fight over judges their political Armageddon, but conservative icon and former federal judge Ken Starr says it has gotten out of control, reports CBS News correspondent Gloria Borger.
“The confirmation process has not only become ugly and has become a shouting match,” he said. “This is a radical, radical departure from our history and our traditions and it amounts to an assault on the judicial branch of government.”
Only problem is that Starr wasn’t talking about the conservatives, as the quote implies, but about the Democrats stonewalling of judicial nominations.
Ramesh Ponnuru of the National Review[*2] e-mailed Starr, and got this response:
“In the piece that I have now seen, and which I gather is being lavishly quoted, CBS employed two snippets. The ‘radical departure’ snippet was specifically addressed — although this is not evidenced whatever from the clip — to the practice of invoking judicial philosopy as a grounds for voting against a qualified nominee of integrity and experience. I said in sharp language that that practice was wrong. I contrasted the current practice . . . with what occurred during Ruth Ginsburg’s nomination process, as numerous Republicans voted (rightly) to confirm a former ACLU staff lawyer. They disagreed with her positions as a lawyer, but they voted (again, rightly) to confirm her. Why? Because elections, like ideas, have consequences. . . . In the interview, I did indeed suggest, and have suggested elsewhere, that caution and prudence be exercised (Burkean that I am) in shifting/modifying rules (that’s the second snippet), but I likewise made clear that the ‘filibuster’ represents an entirely new use (and misuse) of a venerable tradition. . . .
Snookums wonders why I will not watch “60 Minutes.” Well, at this point, anyone who trusts anything coming out of CBS News is at best a dupe. Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show” has more news credibility than CBS News.