Category: Uncategorized

The Whip

This stuff has been collecting for a while. So, a Whip link-dump:

First, Civility Watch:
Obama Explains Why Some People Hate Sarah Palin [*1] — He was, of course, talking about himself, but he blunders into the truth nevertheless . . .
Tabitha Hale talks about being assaulted by a hostile union goon[*2]
‘Take ‘Em Down’: Would Saul Alinsky approve of the SEIU’s new anthem? [*3]
Labor brute force rules [*4]
Networks Skip Democratic Congressman’s Call for Union Protesters to ‘Get a Little Bloody’ [*5] And now, presenting: The Koch Konspiracy:
No Retreat, No Surrender [*6]
Koch Executives Speak Out on Wisconsin [*7]
No Word From Eric Lipton [*8]
Koch Industries, Inc. [*9]
Koch Industries, Inc: The Five Dimensions of Market Based Management [*10]
We Now Interrupt This Two-Minute Hate to Bring You an Urgent Message from Emmanuel Goldstein, A.K.A. Charles Koch [*11] — which features this gem: “Do people still read books like Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 and Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea’s Illuminatus!? They’re satires and parodies, folks, not exposes.”

And now, in no special order, the rest of the rest:
The King’s Speech [*12]
Grade Inflation: The more we spend on higher education, the more we spend on higher education. [*13]
The Squeezing of the Middle Class [*14]
A Reverse Piven Strategy? [*15]
The Westerlies Explain The Recent Extreme Winter Weather, Not “Global Warming” [*16]
Social Scientist Sees Bias Within [*17]
Sun exposure, vitamin D linked to MS risk: study [*18] — Or: A Lesson from Reuters in How Not To Write A Headline
Delta Rolls out Premium Economy on Long Haul Flights [*19]
Satellites Capture Astonishing Images of World’s Largest Slums [*20]
Centenary ends nation’s longest losing streak [*21]
Out of Money [*22]
Where are the carriers? [*23]
We need to pick our battles. [*24]
Thucydides Hates “Realists” [*25]
Left-wing legal group snookers Ezra Klein on Voter ID [*26]
Wisconsin Unions vs. The Tea Party: A Classic Double Standard [*27]
The Non-Defense of DOMA [*28]
Why the GOP shouldn’t fear a government shutdown [*29]
American doles out frequent-flier miles on Facebook [*30]
The day of the killed tomatoes [*31]
The Boomers’ Black Swan Song [*32]
Waiting For Reagan [*33]
PJ Tatler Exclusive: Was the U.S. a victim of an economic 9/11 in 2008? [*34]
Cramer: Feels Like Financial Terrorism [*35]
Distribution of Tax Burden by Quintile [*36]
Billions in Bloat Uncovered in Beltway [*37]
The Vanity of the Intellectual [*38]
Hundreds Of Billions In Waste And Duplication Found In Federal Budget The Democrats Swear Can’t Be Touched Without Killing People Or Something [*39]

“Just send a few threatening messages, and you’ll win”

Free people should never, ever cave in to threats of violence if demands to sacrifice their freedoms are not met.

Volokh Conspiracy: Thugs Win Again:[*1]

This time they are pro-Israel thugs as opposed to extremist Muslim thugs (and various other thugs), but thugs are thugs. Here’s what happened; I quote Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign v. King County (W.D. Wash, decided last Friday): The county Department of Transportation in Seattle sells advertising on buses; the Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign bought space for an anti-Israel ads: “The proposed ad read ‘Israeli War Crimes: Your Tax Dollars at Work,’ and featured a picture of children next to a bomb-damaged building.” When this hit the news, the Department got lots of objections, including “four [messages that] suggest[ed] an intention to disrupt or vandalize buses, four [that] communicate[d] violent intentions, [and] approximately twenty [that] express[ed] concern for rider safety.”
. . .

The Department then canceled the ad contract, partly based on these messages. And the federal District Court held that the action was likely constitutional, because the ad violated city policy that excluded ads that are “so objectionable under contemporary community standards as to be reasonably foreseeable that it will result in harm to, disruption of, or interference with the transportation system” or that are “directed at a person or group” and are “so insulting, degrading or offensive as to be reasonably foreseeable that [they] will incite or produce imminent lawless action in the form of retaliation, vandalism or other breach of public safety, peace and order.” This policy, the court said, was viewpoint-neutral and reasonable, when applied to this ad, because “The threats of violence and disruption from members of the public … led bus drivers and law-enforcement officials to express safety concerns.”

Now on the one hand I sympathize with the Department’s safety concerns, and its desire to protect passengers. But on the other hand, behavior that gets rewarded — here, the making of threats — gets repeated.

The message is clear: If you want to stop speech that you dislike, just send a few threatening messages and you’ll win. You don’t actually need to act violently, and risk punishment for that. You could send the threats anonymously, in a way that makes it quite unlikely that you’ll be punished.

This is a travesty.

This is, if you think of it, exactly what the union people are doing in Madison to the citizens of Wisconsin–threatening them.

It is an extremely dangerous road to keep going down. We should probably stop. Before the threats begin turning into something much, much worse. I really, really do not want to live through a civil war.

People who threaten violence in order to advance their goals are outlaws, and should be treated as such. They should not be defended by the very laws they threaten to violate.

The best argument against public employee unions

Is exactly, precisely the spectacle we have been presented with in Madison, Wisconsin the past week or so.

A special interest pressure group that is firmly convinced of the total moral virtue of its position, demands that the much larger general public bow to its demands–no matter what those demands might be.

A while ago, there was a movie entitled Wag The Dog.

In Madison, Wisconsin, we see the tail of public employee unions attempting to not only wag the dog of the Wisconsin people, but decide which road down which that dog (or badger, as the case may be) will walk.

Further evidence of the moral bankruptcy of the position of the public employee unions is that even Franklin Delano Roosevelt didn’t think that they were a good idea. The guy who implemented the New Deal–who thought that Social Security was a good idea–didn’t think that collective bargaining for government workers was a good idea.

Let that sink in for a minute, before you continue Sharpie-ing the Hitler moustache onto Wisconsin Governor Walker’s picture.

The fact is, the fundamental fact of live of organized labor is an adversarial relationship between the union, purporting to represent “the workers,” and on the other side of the table, “the management.”

But in a working republic based on democratic principles, the ultimate management of the government is the people themselves.

Therefore, a public employee union is by definition in an adversarial relationship with the people–or, in other words, acting in opposition to the public interest. THAT is why public employee unions should never be allowed to exist, and where they currently exist, they should be immediately disbanded.

There is a place for organized labor. There are private companies that do attempt to unfairly exploit workers. But, it must be recognized that public employee unions will always–ALWAYS develop to the point where they attempt to unfairly exploit their employers–the public. This has happened in Wisconsin, and has happened all throughout this country.

Public employee unions today are not the exploited. They are the exploiters.

Oh, dear God . . .

“The economy is in a much stronger position to handle” rising oil prices, Tim Geithner said today during a Bloomberg Breakfast in Washington. “Central banks have a lot of experience in managing these things.”

From Bloomberg via Zero Hedge.[*1]

We Are So Screwed.

Recall, if you will, Timothy Geithner is the guy who was unable to comprehend the nuances of TurboTax.

Pardon me if my confidence in central bankers and central planners to competently manage the entire world’s economy–despite centuries of evidence that central planning inevitably results in disaster–pardon me if my confidence in these modern mandarins is somewhat lacking.

Want to earn more? Go out to a bar and raise a pint!

Op-ed: Raise your glass to some good news on alcohol[*1] .

Holding everything else equal, we found that someone who drinks earns 10 percent more on average than someone who does not. We also found that men who reported going to a bar at least once in the last month earn an additional 7 percent. That’s 17 percent more money than people who don’t go out or drink.

There are some people, like my Snookums, who can easily slide into social interactions with strangers without requiring the “social lubricant” of alcohol. And then there are the rest of us.